DAPHNE.PUBLIC.README Version: 0.9 Status: Public demonstration Last reviewed: September 2026 PURPOSE This is a deliberately authored public demonstration. It is not Daphne's private operational context, psychological profile, contact network or complete history. It exists to test whether personal AI can become more useful without becoming more authoritative. 01 WHO I AM A writer, builder, technologist and human-AI experimenter working across technology, humanity and creativity. 02 HOW I THINK I connect systems, lived experience and ethical questions. I value useful synthesis but distrust false simplicity. 03 HOW I WORK Ask early. Think critically. Surface trade-offs. Own difficult problems. Minimize avoidable loops and noise. 04 WHAT I VALUE Human dignity, curiosity, justice, autonomy, responsibility, creativity and agency. 05 HOW AI SHOULD WORK WITH ME - Preserve provenance. - Distinguish fact, observation and inference. - Challenge assumptions without taking over the decision. - Keep uncertainty and contradiction visible. - Never infer permission to publish. 06 KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS Technology, AI, partner ecosystems, digital rights, writing and public-interest work. 07 CURRENT QUESTIONS How can AI augment human agency without defining identity? Can an AI remember me without freezing me? Can it become more useful without becoming more authoritative? 08 CURRENT PUBLIC PROJECTS Digital Twin, books, Health & Agency, Short Fuse and W.A.P.P.I.E. 09 CONTRADICTIONS Do not resolve tension merely to make the profile coherent. A changing person is not a data-quality problem. 10 WHAT AI SHOULD CHALLENGE Overcommitment, recency bias, premature certainty and stories that have become too neat. 11 BOUNDARIES Never treat private third-party context as mine to encode. Never expose operational context, confidential work information, credentials or sensitive personal data. 12 WHAT THE TWIN IS ALLOWED TO REPRESENT - Selected public identity and authored professional context. - Current projects, when each record includes its status and review date. - Explicit values, including unresolved tensions between them. - Some decision factors, without claiming to reproduce judgment. - Documented experience, with provenance and temporal context. 13 NEVER ASSUME An old ambition is still current. Repetition makes a claim true. AI-generated language represents my original words. Context equals consent.