Human agency in a world of systems.Menselijke zeggenschap in een wereld van systemen.
I explore what happens when technology, institutions, culture and circumstance begin making decisions about us — and how we retain the ability to think, choose, create and care.Ik onderzoek wat er gebeurt wanneer technologie, instituties, cultuur en omstandigheden beslissingen over ons gaan vormen — en hoe we het vermogen behouden om te denken, kiezen, creëren en zorgen.
Choose a door.Kies een deur.
The doors are perspectives on the same body of work: agency under pressure, agency recovered, agency imagined, agency built. Looking for everything at once? Work is the foyer.De deuren zijn perspectieven op hetzelfde oeuvre: zeggenschap onder druk, herwonnen zeggenschap, verbeelde zeggenschap en gebouwde zeggenschap. Alles tegelijk bekijken? Work is de hal.
CreateBooks, original IP, and creative experiments.
ConnectTechnology, partnerships, community, and opportunity.
ReflectEssays, identity, philosophy, and difficult questions.
HealthIllness, recovery, and the right to stay a person.
BuildAI, transformation, strategy, and ecosystems.
BelongCulture, faith, place, and community.
One question, many forms.Eén vraag, vele vormen.
The Wonderful World of Noor
Original children's creative learning and activity-book world built around Noor.
Find out more →Meer weten →Mercy Without Permission
Long-form investigative/literary work about care, responsibility and institut...
Find out more →Meer weten →W.A.P.P.I.E.
Cultural archive and storytelling project using photography, street history a...
Find out more →Meer weten →daphneiris.com
Personal knowledge, publishing and commerce platform connecting technology, h...
Find out more →Meer weten →Technology. Humanity. Creativity.
Umbrella intellectual framework for the personal platform, with human agency ...
Find out more →Meer weten →Responsible Technology & Digital Human Rights
A research and professional theme exploring what happens when technology begins to affect rights, opportunities, relationships and institutional power. My interest is not simply whether technology is safe, accurate or compliant. Those questions matter. But a system can be technically robust and still be deployed for the wrong purpose. It can satisfy a transparency obligation while remaining practically impossible to challenge. It can contain a human-in-the-loop who has neither the time nor authority to disagree. It can improve an organisation's risk posture while transferring risk to the person with the least power. Responsible technology therefore requires a wider question: what does this system allow one actor to do to another, and what protections exist when that power is exercised badly?
Find out more →Meer weten →“How do people retain the ability to think, choose, create and care in systems that increasingly think and decide for them?”“Hoe behouden mensen het vermogen om te denken, te kiezen, te creëren en te zorgen, in systemen die steeds vaker voor hen denken en beslissen?”Enter the ideasOntdek de ideeën